https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387763 The appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act challenged the CESTAT's order remanding the matter for re-adjudication, citing concerns over sustainability, evidence evaluation, and the respondent's manufacturing capacity. The impugned order's validity was questioned due to reliance on a recalled judgment. Allegations of Central Excise Duty evasion were made against the respondent Company, resulting in demand confirmation and penalties. An appeal to CESTAT followed, leading to a High Court appeal. An application to withdraw the appeal based on revised monetary limits was granted, resulting in dismissal. en-us Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Nov 2019 21:03:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387763 The appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act challenged the CESTAT's order remanding the matter for re-adjudication, citing concerns over sustainability, evidence evaluation, and the respondent's manufacturing capacity. The impugned order's validity was questioned due to reliance on a recalled judgment. Allegations of Central Excise Duty evasion were made against the respondent Company, resulting in demand confirmation and penalties. An appeal to CESTAT followed, leading to a High Court appeal. An application to withdraw the appeal based on revised monetary limits was granted, resulting in dismissal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387763