<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 9 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387760</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the inclusion of Royalty Charges in the assessable value for excise duty calculation. The Tribunal found that the Royalty Charges were correctly included in the transaction value of the goods sold by the appellant, as supported by a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate. Emphasizing that duty is chargeable on the actual transaction value post-amended valuation provisions, the Tribunal set aside the demand for Central Excise duty, interest, and penalty imposed on the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 18:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 9 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387760</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the inclusion of Royalty Charges in the assessable value for excise duty calculation. The Tribunal found that the Royalty Charges were correctly included in the transaction value of the goods sold by the appellant, as supported by a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate. Emphasizing that duty is chargeable on the actual transaction value post-amended valuation provisions, the Tribunal set aside the demand for Central Excise duty, interest, and penalty imposed on the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>