<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (3) TMI 93 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284117</link>
    <description>Registration under section 26A of the Income-tax Act, 1922 may be granted where the partnership deeds, read together, identify the real partners, their respective shares, and the terms of the firm, even if the business is described through firm names rather than all individuals in a single deed. Crediting profits in the books to firm names does not defeat registration if the individual constituents&#039; shares can be ascertained from the partnership documents on record. The application is valid where it is signed by the partners of the firm as constituted on the relevant date and the required schedules are furnished. The refusal of registration was therefore unjustified on the stated facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2019 17:53:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (3) TMI 93 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284117</link>
      <description>Registration under section 26A of the Income-tax Act, 1922 may be granted where the partnership deeds, read together, identify the real partners, their respective shares, and the terms of the firm, even if the business is described through firm names rather than all individuals in a single deed. Crediting profits in the books to firm names does not defeat registration if the individual constituents&#039; shares can be ascertained from the partnership documents on record. The application is valid where it is signed by the partners of the firm as constituted on the relevant date and the required schedules are furnished. The refusal of registration was therefore unjustified on the stated facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>