<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 538 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284106</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, rejecting the appellants&#039; claims for regularization and arrears. The court emphasized the necessity of proper approval and legal foundation for appointments in public service, upholding the lower courts&#039; decisions. Balancing sympathy with fairness in recruitment processes, the court ruled against the appellants, highlighting the importance of following established rules and procedures for appointment and regularization.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2019 11:11:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 538 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284106</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, rejecting the appellants&#039; claims for regularization and arrears. The court emphasized the necessity of proper approval and legal foundation for appointments in public service, upholding the lower courts&#039; decisions. Balancing sympathy with fairness in recruitment processes, the court ruled against the appellants, highlighting the importance of following established rules and procedures for appointment and regularization.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>