<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1230 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387746</link>
    <description>The court found the writ petition challenging the communication premature and disposed of it without expressing any view on the merits of the contentions raised by both parties. The petitioner was granted liberty to seek remedy when the demand for interest is made through an order or proceedings, clarifying that the disposal of the writ petition would not hinder the Revenue from collecting tax dues through legal means.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2019 18:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1230 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387746</link>
      <description>The court found the writ petition challenging the communication premature and disposed of it without expressing any view on the merits of the contentions raised by both parties. The petitioner was granted liberty to seek remedy when the demand for interest is made through an order or proceedings, clarifying that the disposal of the writ petition would not hinder the Revenue from collecting tax dues through legal means.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>