<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>No Penalty u/s 271: Disallowed Expenses Exceeded Limited Scrutiny Scope, No Compulsion to Concede Disallowance.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49973</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s. 271 - Disallowance of expenses were beyond the scope of limited scrutiny for which assessee’s case was selected and hence it cannot be held that simply because assessee’s case was selected for scrutiny, therefore, assessee was persuaded for offering the disallowance of expenses. - No penalty</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2019 18:44:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2019 18:44:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>No Penalty u/s 271: Disallowed Expenses Exceeded Limited Scrutiny Scope, No Compulsion to Concede Disallowance.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49973</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s. 271 - Disallowance of expenses were beyond the scope of limited scrutiny for which assessee’s case was selected and hence it cannot be held that simply because assessee’s case was selected for scrutiny, therefore, assessee was persuaded for offering the disallowance of expenses. - No penalty</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2019 18:44:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>