<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1220 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387736</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of declared values, demand for differential duty and interest, and imposition of penalties. However, the order for confiscation of goods and redemption fine was set aside due to unavailability of goods. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2019 18:42:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1220 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387736</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of declared values, demand for differential duty and interest, and imposition of penalties. However, the order for confiscation of goods and redemption fine was set aside due to unavailability of goods. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>