<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1215 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387731</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, as the appellant, who joined the company after the relevant transactions, had no involvement in the clearances or related documentation. The penalty was deemed unwarranted, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant. Two related appeals were adjourned for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2019 18:35:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1215 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387731</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, as the appellant, who joined the company after the relevant transactions, had no involvement in the clearances or related documentation. The penalty was deemed unwarranted, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant. Two related appeals were adjourned for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>