<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 68 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20254</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the Rs. 9,000 addition derived from leased premises. The court emphasized the applicability of Section 28(iv) of the Income-tax Act, stating that benefits arising from business activities are taxable. The court highlighted the direct nexus between the firm&#039;s business and the benefit received by the partner, ultimately concluding that the Rs. 9,000 addition was justified and should be included in the partner&#039;s income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:17:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 68 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20254</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the Rs. 9,000 addition derived from leased premises. The court emphasized the applicability of Section 28(iv) of the Income-tax Act, stating that benefits arising from business activities are taxable. The court highlighted the direct nexus between the firm&#039;s business and the benefit received by the partner, ultimately concluding that the Rs. 9,000 addition was justified and should be included in the partner&#039;s income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>