<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 397 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284098</link>
    <description>Section 15 of the Hindu Marriage Act was construed to cover decrees ending the marital relationship by court intervention, including a decree of nullity under Section 12 as well as a decree of divorce under Section 13, so a pending appeal was not rendered infructuous by the respondent&#039;s remarriage. The Limitation Act was held applicable to an appeal under Section 28 because the Act does not expressly exclude Sections 4 to 24 for appeals, and the time taken to obtain the certified copy had to be excluded in computing limitation. The courts below were set aside and the first appellate court was directed to hear the appeal on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2019 16:36:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 397 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284098</link>
      <description>Section 15 of the Hindu Marriage Act was construed to cover decrees ending the marital relationship by court intervention, including a decree of nullity under Section 12 as well as a decree of divorce under Section 13, so a pending appeal was not rendered infructuous by the respondent&#039;s remarriage. The Limitation Act was held applicable to an appeal under Section 28 because the Act does not expressly exclude Sections 4 to 24 for appeals, and the time taken to obtain the certified copy had to be excluded in computing limitation. The courts below were set aside and the first appellate court was directed to hear the appeal on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>