<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (10) TMI 167 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284092</link>
    <description>Alleged adultery must be proved by reliable evidence, and letters showing improper correspondence did not by themselves establish sexual intercourse or an adulterous relationship; the allegation therefore failed. The amended Hindu Marriage Act provision for divorce could not be invoked directly without first obtaining a decree for judicial separation, so the divorce decree could not stand. Continued cohabitation and marital relations after knowledge of the alleged misconduct amounted to condonation, which barred judicial separation. The High Court&#039;s decree was set aside and the dismissal of the matrimonial petition was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2019 15:21:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (10) TMI 167 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284092</link>
      <description>Alleged adultery must be proved by reliable evidence, and letters showing improper correspondence did not by themselves establish sexual intercourse or an adulterous relationship; the allegation therefore failed. The amended Hindu Marriage Act provision for divorce could not be invoked directly without first obtaining a decree for judicial separation, so the divorce decree could not stand. Continued cohabitation and marital relations after knowledge of the alleged misconduct amounted to condonation, which barred judicial separation. The High Court&#039;s decree was set aside and the dismissal of the matrimonial petition was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>