<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 884 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284090</link>
    <description>Existing operators and permit holders may challenge a permit grant in writ jurisdiction where the grant is alleged to contravene statutory provisions or binding governmental directions. The permits for five-seater autos had to conform to Government Orders issued under the Motor Vehicles Act and were confined to the district headquarters; operation beyond that territorial limit was not authorised. Even though the applications were made under the Act and the Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Rules, the grants were treated as resting on the Government Orders, so departures from those limits could not be saved by the general provisions invoked. Grants beyond the authorised area were therefore invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 16:38:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 884 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284090</link>
      <description>Existing operators and permit holders may challenge a permit grant in writ jurisdiction where the grant is alleged to contravene statutory provisions or binding governmental directions. The permits for five-seater autos had to conform to Government Orders issued under the Motor Vehicles Act and were confined to the district headquarters; operation beyond that territorial limit was not authorised. Even though the applications were made under the Act and the Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Rules, the grants were treated as resting on the Government Orders, so departures from those limits could not be saved by the general provisions invoked. Grants beyond the authorised area were therefore invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>