https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284089 Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act permits a Labour Court to determine a disputed entitlement to an existing benefit as an incidental step in computing its monetary value. This includes interpreting the underlying award or settlement, provided the Labour Court does not alter or go beyond its terms; the separate interpretation mechanism under section 36A does not exclude that power. Eligibility for a Comptist allowance depends on the actual duties, skill and responsibility required under the Sastry Award, rather than an employer's job title. Mere operation of an adding machine does not establish Comptist status. The claims required fresh adjudication on evidence of the work performed. en-us Fri, 19 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:34:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284089 Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act permits a Labour Court to determine a disputed entitlement to an existing benefit as an incidental step in computing its monetary value. This includes interpreting the underlying award or settlement, provided the Labour Court does not alter or go beyond its terms; the separate interpretation mechanism under section 36A does not exclude that power. Eligibility for a Comptist allowance depends on the actual duties, skill and responsibility required under the Sastry Award, rather than an employer's job title. Mere operation of an adding machine does not establish Comptist status. The claims required fresh adjudication on evidence of the work performed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284089