https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284089 Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act is described as a mechanism for speedy enforcement of existing individual workmen's rights, and the Labour Court may incidentally determine disputed entitlement and interpret the award or settlement on which the claim rests, so long as it does not go behind or alter that instrument. The note also explains that entitlement to the Sastry Award's special allowance depends on the nature of the duties and the skill involved, not the employer's nomenclature. On the facts discussed, merely operating adding machines was treated as insufficient, as no evidence showed performance of Comptists' work as understood in the banking industry. en-us Fri, 19 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:34:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284089 Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act is described as a mechanism for speedy enforcement of existing individual workmen's rights, and the Labour Court may incidentally determine disputed entitlement and interpret the award or settlement on which the claim rests, so long as it does not go behind or alter that instrument. The note also explains that entitlement to the Sastry Award's special allowance depends on the nature of the duties and the skill involved, not the employer's nomenclature. On the facts discussed, merely operating adding machines was treated as insufficient, as no evidence showed performance of Comptists' work as understood in the banking industry. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284089