https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387694 SC dismissed the application to recall its ex parte judgment, holding that the company was duly served through its authorized representative and had adequate opportunity to appear. The explanations for non-appearance - mistaking the Court dasti notice for income tax papers and the representative's alleged cataract surgery - were found not credible, particularly as the notice was served well before the claimed surgery and the representative acted for the company before tax authorities thereafter. The recall plea was rejected as devoid of merit. en-us Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Jun 2026 16:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387694 SC dismissed the application to recall its ex parte judgment, holding that the company was duly served through its authorized representative and had adequate opportunity to appear. The explanations for non-appearance - mistaking the Court dasti notice for income tax papers and the representative's alleged cataract surgery - were found not credible, particularly as the notice was served well before the claimed surgery and the representative acted for the company before tax authorities thereafter. The recall plea was rejected as devoid of merit. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387694