<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1173 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387689</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the penalty order under Section 271AAB due to defective notice and lack of specific findings by the AO. The penalty of Rs. 1,20,710 was deleted as the cash found was not clearly linked to the assessee, emphasizing the importance of clear and specific notices in penalty proceedings for natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1173 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387689</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the penalty order under Section 271AAB due to defective notice and lack of specific findings by the AO. The penalty of Rs. 1,20,710 was deleted as the cash found was not clearly linked to the assessee, emphasizing the importance of clear and specific notices in penalty proceedings for natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>