<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1148 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387664</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed, remanding the matter to the original authority for further examination of supporting documents for the refund claim. The denial of refund based solely on non-disclosure in ST-3 returns was deemed legally unsustainable. The judgment emphasized the beneficial nature of Cenvat Credit Rules and ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the rejection and providing an opportunity for proper consideration of the refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:00:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1148 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387664</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed, remanding the matter to the original authority for further examination of supporting documents for the refund claim. The denial of refund based solely on non-disclosure in ST-3 returns was deemed legally unsustainable. The judgment emphasized the beneficial nature of Cenvat Credit Rules and ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the rejection and providing an opportunity for proper consideration of the refund claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>