https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387659 The Member (Judicial) set aside the duty demand, annulled or reduced the confiscation of goods and penalties imposed under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The decision was based on the lack of evidence showing an intention to evade duty, acceptance of technical issues causing non-accounting of excess stock, and absence of clandestine clearance attempts. The duty liability was recognized upon goods clearance from the factory, leading to modifications or annulments of penalties. The deceased appellant's appeal was abated, and the appeals were disposed of accordingly. en-us Thu, 24 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Oct 2019 18:56:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387659 The Member (Judicial) set aside the duty demand, annulled or reduced the confiscation of goods and penalties imposed under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The decision was based on the lack of evidence showing an intention to evade duty, acceptance of technical issues causing non-accounting of excess stock, and absence of clandestine clearance attempts. The duty liability was recognized upon goods clearance from the factory, leading to modifications or annulments of penalties. The deceased appellant's appeal was abated, and the appeals were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 24 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387659