https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=115606 An FDR held in the Registrar's name on court direction produced interest from November 2016; absent a PAN from the court, the bank deducted TDS at the higher rate and deposited it against the Registrar. After ownership was finally allocated and funds distributed to three owners, each received amounts net of the prior TDS. The owners contend the TDS should be reflected against their PANs so they can claim credit or refunds, but face non-cooperation from the court office and bank in securing adjustment or return of the deducted tax. en-us Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:26:26 +0530 Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:54:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=115606 An FDR held in the Registrar's name on court direction produced interest from November 2016; absent a PAN from the court, the bank deducted TDS at the higher rate and deposited it against the Registrar. After ownership was finally allocated and funds distributed to three owners, each received amounts net of the prior TDS. The owners contend the TDS should be reflected against their PANs so they can claim credit or refunds, but face non-cooperation from the court office and bank in securing adjustment or return of the deducted tax. Discussion-Forum Income Tax Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:26:26 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=115606