https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284078 The amended Development Control Regulation 58 was construed as a self-contained scheme for redevelopment of cotton textile mill lands, and "open lands" was held to include land that became vacant after demolition of existing structures. The 28 March 2003 clarification was treated as a substantive alteration of the computation of sharable area, not a mere clarification, and was therefore invalid for want of the prescribed statutory procedure. The Court also recorded that the redevelopment activities lacked the requisite environmental clearance and that NTC land disposals conflicted with Supreme Court orders and the sanctioned BIFR scheme, while the broader constitutional challenge was left open. en-us Mon, 17 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Oct 2019 09:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284078 The amended Development Control Regulation 58 was construed as a self-contained scheme for redevelopment of cotton textile mill lands, and "open lands" was held to include land that became vacant after demolition of existing structures. The 28 March 2003 clarification was treated as a substantive alteration of the computation of sharable area, not a mere clarification, and was therefore invalid for want of the prescribed statutory procedure. The Court also recorded that the redevelopment activities lacked the requisite environmental clearance and that NTC land disposals conflicted with Supreme Court orders and the sanctioned BIFR scheme, while the broader constitutional challenge was left open. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284078