<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (10) TMI 62 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20230</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the textile manufacturing company, allowing the expenditure on modernizing machinery as revenue expenditure. The court emphasized the necessity of modernization in a competitive business environment and cited relevant cases to support its decision. However, the issue of bonus deduction was deferred for further examination by the Tribunal in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:22:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (10) TMI 62 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20230</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the textile manufacturing company, allowing the expenditure on modernizing machinery as revenue expenditure. The court emphasized the necessity of modernization in a competitive business environment and cited relevant cases to support its decision. However, the issue of bonus deduction was deferred for further examination by the Tribunal in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>