<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1129 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387645</link>
    <description>Freight payments incurred by an on-board courier agency were treated as direct business expenditure forming part of business profits under section 28 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On that basis, the disallowance for non-deduction of tax at source under section 40(a)(ia) was not attracted, because that provision applies only to deductions governed by sections 30 to 38. The commission element was separately taxed, while the freight cost was regarded as the direct cost of transporting parcels for other courier companies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2019 11:33:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1129 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387645</link>
      <description>Freight payments incurred by an on-board courier agency were treated as direct business expenditure forming part of business profits under section 28 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On that basis, the disallowance for non-deduction of tax at source under section 40(a)(ia) was not attracted, because that provision applies only to deductions governed by sections 30 to 38. The commission element was separately taxed, while the freight cost was regarded as the direct cost of transporting parcels for other courier companies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>