<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1123 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387639</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271AAB was invalid due to vague show cause notices and the discretionary nature of the penalty. The penalty imposed on disclosed income for land advances and excess jewellery was deemed unjustified, resulting in the penalty&#039;s deletion. The decision highlights the significance of precise notices and the discretionary aspect of penalties under section 271AAB.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2019 11:01:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1123 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387639</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271AAB was invalid due to vague show cause notices and the discretionary nature of the penalty. The penalty imposed on disclosed income for land advances and excess jewellery was deemed unjustified, resulting in the penalty&#039;s deletion. The decision highlights the significance of precise notices and the discretionary aspect of penalties under section 271AAB.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>