https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387636 The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the addition towards alleged unaccounted investment from Rs. 87,60,000 to Rs. 22,40,000. It upheld the validity of the seized documents as evidence, establishing a connection between the transactions and the assessee. The tribunal concluded that only the difference between the disclosed and undisclosed amounts should be treated as unaccounted investment, providing partial relief to the assessee. en-us Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Oct 2019 10:46:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387636 The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the addition towards alleged unaccounted investment from Rs. 87,60,000 to Rs. 22,40,000. It upheld the validity of the seized documents as evidence, establishing a connection between the transactions and the assessee. The tribunal concluded that only the difference between the disclosed and undisclosed amounts should be treated as unaccounted investment, providing partial relief to the assessee. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387636