<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1104 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387620</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner&#039;s denial of Cenvat Credit on construction service, clearing and forwarding service, and real estate service. The Tribunal held that these services were essential for the telecommunication business activities of the Appellant and qualified as &#039;input services&#039; under the relevant rules. Previous decisions supported the necessity of these services for telecommunication operations, leading to the reversal of the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2019 10:03:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1104 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387620</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner&#039;s denial of Cenvat Credit on construction service, clearing and forwarding service, and real estate service. The Tribunal held that these services were essential for the telecommunication business activities of the Appellant and qualified as &#039;input services&#039; under the relevant rules. Previous decisions supported the necessity of these services for telecommunication operations, leading to the reversal of the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>