<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1095 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387611</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals in a case concerning specific performance of an agreement of sale. The court affirmed the trial court&#039;s decree for specific performance but modified it to entitle the plaintiffs to only 50% of the property, corresponding to the share of late K. Basavaraja Urs, setting aside the decree concerning the remaining 50% share of defendant No.1. The court directed the trial court to divide the property into two equal proportions accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2019 07:56:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1095 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387611</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals in a case concerning specific performance of an agreement of sale. The court affirmed the trial court&#039;s decree for specific performance but modified it to entitle the plaintiffs to only 50% of the property, corresponding to the share of late K. Basavaraja Urs, setting aside the decree concerning the remaining 50% share of defendant No.1. The court directed the trial court to divide the property into two equal proportions accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>