<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (5) TMI 198 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284073</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, holding that the Income Tax Officer lacked jurisdiction to rectify the assessment once the Commissioner (Appeals) had decided on the status of the assessee. The High Court answered the reference question in the affirmative and in favor of the revenue, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 18:25:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (5) TMI 198 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284073</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, holding that the Income Tax Officer lacked jurisdiction to rectify the assessment once the Commissioner (Appeals) had decided on the status of the assessee. The High Court answered the reference question in the affirmative and in favor of the revenue, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>