<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1086 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387602</link>
    <description>Interim release of a seized conveyance under the CGST Act was directed where the petitioner deposited the fine computed in the confiscation order. The Court clarified that the relief was limited to release of the conveyance only, and did not extend to any broader return of seized goods or other property. The operative effect was that deposit of the fine in lieu of confiscation triggered immediate release of the vehicle from seizure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 18:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1086 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387602</link>
      <description>Interim release of a seized conveyance under the CGST Act was directed where the petitioner deposited the fine computed in the confiscation order. The Court clarified that the relief was limited to release of the conveyance only, and did not extend to any broader return of seized goods or other property. The operative effect was that deposit of the fine in lieu of confiscation triggered immediate release of the vehicle from seizure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>