<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1081 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387597</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment under section 148 beyond four years was challenged on the basis that the recorded reasons relied on material already on record, the deduction issue under section 80IA had been examined in scrutiny assessment, and the proposed reassessment reflected a change of opinion. On that showing, the Court issued notice and granted ad-interim protection, restraining further action under the impugned notice pending consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 16:21:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1081 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387597</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment under section 148 beyond four years was challenged on the basis that the recorded reasons relied on material already on record, the deduction issue under section 80IA had been examined in scrutiny assessment, and the proposed reassessment reflected a change of opinion. On that showing, the Court issued notice and granted ad-interim protection, restraining further action under the impugned notice pending consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>