<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1072 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387588</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting additions of Rs. 59,50,000/- and Rs. 14,25,000/- under Section 68 of the IT Act. The decision emphasized the importance of documentary evidence and required the AO to provide concrete findings before making additions. The Tribunal found that the assessee sufficiently explained the sources and transactions, discharging the burden of proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:52:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1072 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387588</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting additions of Rs. 59,50,000/- and Rs. 14,25,000/- under Section 68 of the IT Act. The decision emphasized the importance of documentary evidence and required the AO to provide concrete findings before making additions. The Tribunal found that the assessee sufficiently explained the sources and transactions, discharging the burden of proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>