https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387582 The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order, remanding the matter to the AO for a de novo examination to determine if payments were genuine reimbursements, directing the appellant to submit relevant evidence. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, with the decision for AY 2013-14 applied mutatis mutandis to AYs 2014-15, 2015-16, and 2016-17. en-us Mon, 07 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Nov 2024 11:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387582 The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order, remanding the matter to the AO for a de novo examination to determine if payments were genuine reimbursements, directing the appellant to submit relevant evidence. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, with the decision for AY 2013-14 applied mutatis mutandis to AYs 2014-15, 2015-16, and 2016-17. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 07 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387582