<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1065 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387581</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the write-off of advances to a wholly owned subsidiary as a business deduction, citing lack of documentary evidence and concluding the advances were capital in nature. However, the Tribunal directed the AO to verify the treatment of interest income from a bank and adjust it accordingly, allowing the appeal on this issue for statistical purposes. The order was issued on 04/10/2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:43:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1065 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387581</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the write-off of advances to a wholly owned subsidiary as a business deduction, citing lack of documentary evidence and concluding the advances were capital in nature. However, the Tribunal directed the AO to verify the treatment of interest income from a bank and adjust it accordingly, allowing the appeal on this issue for statistical purposes. The order was issued on 04/10/2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>