<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 568 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284068</link>
    <description>The court directed the authorities to return all 78 seized gold bars to the petitioner within ten working days. The ruling emphasized the lack of stay on the orders challenged before CESTAT and the need to comply with adjudicating authority decisions. Costs were imposed on the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:35:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 568 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284068</link>
      <description>The court directed the authorities to return all 78 seized gold bars to the petitioner within ten working days. The ruling emphasized the lack of stay on the orders challenged before CESTAT and the need to comply with adjudicating authority decisions. Costs were imposed on the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>