<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1058 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387574</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal upheld the validity of the Assessing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction under section 147 but restored the issues concerning the disallowance of deduction for provision for EMD and advances written off, as well as the treatment of additional evidence, to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for a fresh decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:14:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1058 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387574</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal upheld the validity of the Assessing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction under section 147 but restored the issues concerning the disallowance of deduction for provision for EMD and advances written off, as well as the treatment of additional evidence, to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for a fresh decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>