<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1053 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387569</link>
    <description>The tribunal found the appellant, a public limited company, in violation of Regulation 33 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulation, 2015 for failing to upload unaudited financial results within the specified time frame. The original fine of Rs. 5,54,600 was reduced to Rs. 2,50,000 due to the inadvertent nature of the violation and steps taken to rectify it. The tribunal emphasized the importance of timely financial information dissemination to investors but acknowledged the lack of deliberate intent in the non-compliance. The penalty was modified, and the appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 14:45:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1053 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387569</link>
      <description>The tribunal found the appellant, a public limited company, in violation of Regulation 33 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulation, 2015 for failing to upload unaudited financial results within the specified time frame. The original fine of Rs. 5,54,600 was reduced to Rs. 2,50,000 due to the inadvertent nature of the violation and steps taken to rectify it. The tribunal emphasized the importance of timely financial information dissemination to investors but acknowledged the lack of deliberate intent in the non-compliance. The penalty was modified, and the appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>