<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1049 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387565</link>
    <description>The appeal in the case challenging a penalty of Rs. 40 lacs for insider trading violations was partially allowed. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 30 lacs as there was no unfair advantage or investor loss. The Tribunal stressed the significance of timely disclosures under securities regulations and adjusted the penalty in consideration of the circumstances and the interest of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:51:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1049 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387565</link>
      <description>The appeal in the case challenging a penalty of Rs. 40 lacs for insider trading violations was partially allowed. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 30 lacs as there was no unfair advantage or investor loss. The Tribunal stressed the significance of timely disclosures under securities regulations and adjusted the penalty in consideration of the circumstances and the interest of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>