<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (8) TMI 40 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20214</link>
    <description>The court determined that the rental income from a residential building, not utilized for the assessee&#039;s business activities but rented out to tenants, should be classified as &quot;Income from house property&quot; under section 22 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The claim for depreciation on the building was rejected as it was not used for the business of the assessee. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, affirming the classification of rental income and denying the allowance of depreciation on the building.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:13:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (8) TMI 40 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20214</link>
      <description>The court determined that the rental income from a residential building, not utilized for the assessee&#039;s business activities but rented out to tenants, should be classified as &quot;Income from house property&quot; under section 22 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The claim for depreciation on the building was rejected as it was not used for the business of the assessee. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, affirming the classification of rental income and denying the allowance of depreciation on the building.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>