https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387556 The High Court addressed an appeal under Sections 35 G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against a CESTAT order remanding the matter for re-quantification of duty demand within the normal limitation period and setting aside the penalty. Despite the correctness of the demand on merits, the Court examined whether recovery could be limited to the normal period due to non-disclosure. An application to withdraw the appeal based on revised monetary limits was granted, leading to the appeal's dismissal as withdrawn. en-us Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:25:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387556 The High Court addressed an appeal under Sections 35 G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against a CESTAT order remanding the matter for re-quantification of duty demand within the normal limitation period and setting aside the penalty. Despite the correctness of the demand on merits, the Court examined whether recovery could be limited to the normal period due to non-disclosure. An application to withdraw the appeal based on revised monetary limits was granted, leading to the appeal's dismissal as withdrawn. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387556