<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>UNDERVALUATION OF GOODS IN TRANSIT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=115588</link>
    <description>Whether officers may suspect declared consignment values and estimate value during interception when invoice value diverges from market price, relying on market rates and expert testing, and propose penalties under Section 129(3) of GST; issues include scope of officer powers to revalue goods in transit, permissible evidentiary bases for revaluation, procedural limits on rejecting invoices, and nexus between rejection and penalty proposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:31:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:54:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>UNDERVALUATION OF GOODS IN TRANSIT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=115588</link>
      <description>Whether officers may suspect declared consignment values and estimate value during interception when invoice value diverges from market price, relying on market rates and expert testing, and propose penalties under Section 129(3) of GST; issues include scope of officer powers to revalue goods in transit, permissible evidentiary bases for revaluation, procedural limits on rejecting invoices, and nexus between rejection and penalty proposal.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:31:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=115588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>