https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387545 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, affirming that the Arbitrator had jurisdiction to consider the counter claim regarding CENVAT invoices. The Arbitrator was directed to determine the validity of the counter claim after due enquiry, and the proceedings should continue without preconceptions. The appeal was dismissed, and the matter was to proceed on its merits in accordance with the law. en-us Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Jan 2020 13:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387545 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, affirming that the Arbitrator had jurisdiction to consider the counter claim regarding CENVAT invoices. The Arbitrator was directed to determine the validity of the counter claim after due enquiry, and the proceedings should continue without preconceptions. The appeal was dismissed, and the matter was to proceed on its merits in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387545