<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1432 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284062</link>
    <description>The court acknowledged the non-payment of refunds despite final assessment orders and directed the respondent to pay the petitioner within two weeks. Disputes over the finality of assessment orders were raised but the court instructed the respondent to decide on pending refund applications within 3 months. The petition was disposed of with instructions for cooperation and clarification provision, leaving all contentions open for future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:08:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1432 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284062</link>
      <description>The court acknowledged the non-payment of refunds despite final assessment orders and directed the respondent to pay the petitioner within two weeks. Disputes over the finality of assessment orders were raised but the court instructed the respondent to decide on pending refund applications within 3 months. The petition was disposed of with instructions for cooperation and clarification provision, leaving all contentions open for future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>