<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1936 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284059</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under Section 263, deeming it null and void due to the dissolution of the assessee company and lack of procedural fairness. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the invalidity of the assessment order on a non-existing entity. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of adherence to procedural fairness and the right to be heard, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee on 26/02/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:08:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1936 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284059</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under Section 263, deeming it null and void due to the dissolution of the assessee company and lack of procedural fairness. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the invalidity of the assessment order on a non-existing entity. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of adherence to procedural fairness and the right to be heard, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee on 26/02/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>