<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1022 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387538</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the demand of interest on delayed payments and imposition of a penalty. It held that the demand of interest beyond the normal limitation period was barred and confirmed the interest amount to the extent already deposited by the appellants. The tribunal also set aside the penalty imposed, citing the absence of any mala fide intent on the part of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:07:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1022 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387538</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the demand of interest on delayed payments and imposition of a penalty. It held that the demand of interest beyond the normal limitation period was barred and confirmed the interest amount to the extent already deposited by the appellants. The tribunal also set aside the penalty imposed, citing the absence of any mala fide intent on the part of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>