<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 83 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20205</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue on the first three issues, stating that the interest amount is a revenue receipt, the assessee followed the cash system of accounting post-business termination, and deductions for interest paid to the Federal Bank are allowable only for the relevant assessment year. However, the court ruled in favor of the assessee on the fourth issue, allowing the deduction for interest paid to the Federal Bank during the relevant assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:54:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 83 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20205</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue on the first three issues, stating that the interest amount is a revenue receipt, the assessee followed the cash system of accounting post-business termination, and deductions for interest paid to the Federal Bank are allowable only for the relevant assessment year. However, the court ruled in favor of the assessee on the fourth issue, allowing the deduction for interest paid to the Federal Bank during the relevant assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>