<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (7) TMI 413 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284042</link>
    <description>Account books cannot be rejected merely because they were not produced during survey; there must be material showing suppression, defect, withheld records, or unreliability. Here, the assessee had maintained and produced books at assessment, and no unrecorded transactions or suppression were found. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on the presence of family members and an alleged stock discrepancy lacked legal evidence, especially as the survey stock was not objectively counted and the stock register could still have been correct. On these facts, rejection of accounts and best judgment assessment were not sustainable, and the Tribunal&#039;s finding was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:39:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (7) TMI 413 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284042</link>
      <description>Account books cannot be rejected merely because they were not produced during survey; there must be material showing suppression, defect, withheld records, or unreliability. Here, the assessee had maintained and produced books at assessment, and no unrecorded transactions or suppression were found. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on the presence of family members and an alleged stock discrepancy lacked legal evidence, especially as the survey stock was not objectively counted and the stock register could still have been correct. On these facts, rejection of accounts and best judgment assessment were not sustainable, and the Tribunal&#039;s finding was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>