<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 646 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284041</link>
    <description>A constitutional commission may regulate its own procedure only where that procedure remains consistent with mandatory statutory recruitment rules; a process that overrides those rules is invalid. The selection under the recruitment rules was found inconsistent because it ignored required criteria such as academic qualification, teaching and research experience, while giving excessive weight to viva voce, which was held unreasonable and arbitrary. The higher-qualification language was confined to the relevant super-specialty post, not an unrelated specialty. The appellant was directed to receive proper placement in the select list with consequential seniority and monetary benefits, without disturbing completed appointments beyond what time and equity required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:52:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 646 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284041</link>
      <description>A constitutional commission may regulate its own procedure only where that procedure remains consistent with mandatory statutory recruitment rules; a process that overrides those rules is invalid. The selection under the recruitment rules was found inconsistent because it ignored required criteria such as academic qualification, teaching and research experience, while giving excessive weight to viva voce, which was held unreasonable and arbitrary. The higher-qualification language was confined to the relevant super-specialty post, not an unrelated specialty. The appellant was directed to receive proper placement in the select list with consequential seniority and monetary benefits, without disturbing completed appointments beyond what time and equity required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>