<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 733 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284038</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition filed by IDPL officers and supervisors seeking interim relief and pay-scale revision per the Fifth Pay Commission. The court ruled that due to IDPL&#039;s financial incapacity and its status as a sick company, the petitioners, having opted for VRS, had no legal right to demand wage revision. The court found the claims lacked merit, referencing the inapplicability of the Jute Corporation judgment, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 733 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284038</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition filed by IDPL officers and supervisors seeking interim relief and pay-scale revision per the Fifth Pay Commission. The court ruled that due to IDPL&#039;s financial incapacity and its status as a sick company, the petitioners, having opted for VRS, had no legal right to demand wage revision. The court found the claims lacked merit, referencing the inapplicability of the Jute Corporation judgment, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>