<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 733 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284038</link>
    <description>Employees of a sick public sector undertaking cannot claim, as of right, revision of pay scales or Government-funded salary enhancement when the employer lacks financial capacity and revival has failed. The SC treated the undertaking&#039;s economic viability, continuing losses, closure of major units, and the failure of statutory rehabilitation efforts as controlling factors in wage fixation. It held that employees of government companies are not Government servants and cannot compel the State to bear the additional wage burden. In this background, earlier directions on pay revision did not create an enforceable entitlement, and the claim for interim relief was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 733 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284038</link>
      <description>Employees of a sick public sector undertaking cannot claim, as of right, revision of pay scales or Government-funded salary enhancement when the employer lacks financial capacity and revival has failed. The SC treated the undertaking&#039;s economic viability, continuing losses, closure of major units, and the failure of statutory rehabilitation efforts as controlling factors in wage fixation. It held that employees of government companies are not Government servants and cannot compel the State to bear the additional wage burden. In this background, earlier directions on pay revision did not create an enforceable entitlement, and the claim for interim relief was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>