https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284035 Fraud-based extension of limitation requires specific pleadings showing active concealment of the right to sue; general allegations, suppression of title deeds, non-disclosure of sales, or failure to account for proceeds do not suffice without particulars under Order VII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Section 18 of the Limitation Act does not apply where no deliberate representation or fraudulent conduct by transferees is established. Alienations by a de facto guardian are voidable and governed by article 44 of the Limitation Act, 1908. Knowledge of the sale deeds triggered the applicable limitation period, rendering the challenge to the sales time-barred. en-us Fri, 14 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:40:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284035 Fraud-based extension of limitation requires specific pleadings showing active concealment of the right to sue; general allegations, suppression of title deeds, non-disclosure of sales, or failure to account for proceeds do not suffice without particulars under Order VII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Section 18 of the Limitation Act does not apply where no deliberate representation or fraudulent conduct by transferees is established. Alienations by a de facto guardian are voidable and governed by article 44 of the Limitation Act, 1908. Knowledge of the sale deeds triggered the applicable limitation period, rendering the challenge to the sales time-barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284035