https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284035 A plea of fraud will not extend limitation under section 18 of the Limitation Act unless the plaint sets out specific particulars showing active concealment of the right to sue; general allegations of suppression, non-disclosure of sales, or failure to account for proceeds are insufficient. The article also states that alienations by a de facto guardian are voidable and fall within article 44 of the Limitation Act, 1908, and that such transactions remain within that limitation framework where the factual basis supports it. On the stated facts, the plaintiff's receipt of the sale deeds in July 1947 meant that a suit filed in April 1954 was time-barred. en-us Fri, 14 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:40:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284035 A plea of fraud will not extend limitation under section 18 of the Limitation Act unless the plaint sets out specific particulars showing active concealment of the right to sue; general allegations of suppression, non-disclosure of sales, or failure to account for proceeds are insufficient. The article also states that alienations by a de facto guardian are voidable and fall within article 44 of the Limitation Act, 1908, and that such transactions remain within that limitation framework where the factual basis supports it. On the stated facts, the plaintiff's receipt of the sale deeds in July 1947 meant that a suit filed in April 1954 was time-barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Mar 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284035