<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (2) TMI 127 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284034</link>
    <description>A compromise, arbitral award and decree affecting a minor&#039;s property are void where the minor was not represented by a lawful guardian, because a settlement without proper protection of the minor&#039;s interest does not bind the minor. Limitation does not run where fraud conceals the true basis of the claim and the claimant lacks knowledge of the real character of the property; concealment of the properties as non-divisible religious endowment property prevented time from starting earlier. Possession by one co-heir is not adverse absent clear ouster and denial of title, so the partition claim was not defeated on limitation or adverse possession grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (2) TMI 127 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284034</link>
      <description>A compromise, arbitral award and decree affecting a minor&#039;s property are void where the minor was not represented by a lawful guardian, because a settlement without proper protection of the minor&#039;s interest does not bind the minor. Limitation does not run where fraud conceals the true basis of the claim and the claimant lacks knowledge of the real character of the property; concealment of the properties as non-divisible religious endowment property prevented time from starting earlier. Possession by one co-heir is not adverse absent clear ouster and denial of title, so the partition claim was not defeated on limitation or adverse possession grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>