<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1011 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387527</link>
    <description>Repeated detention of a conveyance and goods after payment of tax, penalty and fine in lieu of confiscation raised the question whether the Court should intervene in proceedings under section 130 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The High Court issued notice and made it returnable on 22.10.2019, permitting direct service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1011 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387527</link>
      <description>Repeated detention of a conveyance and goods after payment of tax, penalty and fine in lieu of confiscation raised the question whether the Court should intervene in proceedings under section 130 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The High Court issued notice and made it returnable on 22.10.2019, permitting direct service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>