<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1008 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387524</link>
    <description>The High Court issued notices to the parties in a case challenging Section 17(5)(C) and (D) of the Central Goods and Services Act 2017 on grounds of double taxation and discrimination. The petitioner argued for credit on input goods and services used in mall construction, citing a favorable interpretation in a prior case. The case is set for further proceedings following the waiver of notice service by the Additional Solicitor General for some respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2020 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=591986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1008 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387524</link>
      <description>The High Court issued notices to the parties in a case challenging Section 17(5)(C) and (D) of the Central Goods and Services Act 2017 on grounds of double taxation and discrimination. The petitioner argued for credit on input goods and services used in mall construction, citing a favorable interpretation in a prior case. The case is set for further proceedings following the waiver of notice service by the Additional Solicitor General for some respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=387524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>